Archive for Dublin

Toastmastering Season Begins!

Autumn is here, well it has been here for the past 30 days but thankfully the weather has helped us live in denial for just a little bit longer. Of course with Autumn comes a next term of “toastmastering”. On the 16th of September we will restart our Toastmaster sessions in Hellfire. We’ll have 3 or 4 speeches, a debate and table topics. Guests are very welcome to come and don’t worry you don’t have to contribute anything at your first meeting unless you’d like to of course. There is no charge for attending as a guest.


So to recap…. September 16th (Tuesday) at 7.45pm in the Ballsbridge Hotel (D4 Hotel). Email me (Eric) at if you have any further questions.

Hellfire Review 29-10-2013

Should psychics and mediums be banned? Hellfire Toastmasters voted no.

We had a Halloween theme for our meeting tonight, with some speeches and the topics on this theme.  Pat, our President, began the evening at the disputed time of 7 59 (he said it was that time, others said it was 8 02), and welcomed everyone, and especially the guests on the night.  He had one message which was the Christmas Party in December.  Barry was Toastmaster for the night, and he began with a story about fear given that it was two days before Halloween.  David was Sargent At Arms and Eric was timer and they gave a quick explanation of their roles, before we heard the speeches.

Shauna gave the first speech of the night, which was her Ice-Breaker.  This speech gives new members a chance to speak before an audience for the first time, and discover speaking skills they already have.  Shauna spoke about herself, coming from Monaghan but having spent a few years in Australia when she was younger.  It was quite a humorous speech, telling us about how she spent a long time in education to become an actuary and how her boyfriend gradually moved in with her.  Finally Shauna told us that she joined Toastmasters to beat her fear of public speaking.

The second speech of the night was given by David, a Stage 3 speech titled “Wind energy in Ireland.”  The third speech in the manual asks speakers to Get to the Point and for the speech to have a purpose.  The speech’s subject stems from when David saw signs protesting against wind energy coming to Ireland while driving through the midlands. David did some research on the matter and gave a lot of statistics during his speech – there are 180 wind farms in Ireland, but only one off shore farm on the east coast.  The industry is highly subsidised, and David had reservations about how sustainable they are, given that wind only produces about 30% of its possibly energy.  David had more questions than answers in his speech, and ended by asking the audience whether wind energy is sustainable in Ireland and whether people would like a windmill in their back garden.

Third speaker on the night was Dennis, giving off stage speech entitled “A Night to Remember”.  He began by saying that as a scientist, he is usually sceptical about things that cannot be proven, and, for example, didn’t worry about moving into House No. 13.  An elderly couple lived beside Dennis and over the years they became friends.  Both the man and the woman died within a short period of each other but on the night of the woman’s death, Dennis heard a loud, screechy noise.  He thought it was a cat, but changed his mind, and then he thought it was a baby crying.  The next morning when he heard that the woman died, he tried to figure out what the noise was as he decided it couldn’t have been a cat or a baby.  Dennis, the sceptical scientist, believes it was a banshee.  It was a suitably eerie story for the night that’s in it.

The motion for the debate was that “psychics and mediums should be banned”, proposed by Richard and opposed by Brian.  Richard spoke about how psychics and mediums aren’t able to scientifically prove their abilities, and how it is wrong to take money off people without giving them a service in return.  Brian spoke about how psychics and mediums can give some solace to people and that banning won’t work.  After numerous contributions from the floor and summations by both speakers, a vote was taken and the motion was defeated.  We then took a break for tea and biscuits.

Mandy, dressed in black and wearing a witch’s hat was Topicsmaster and all of her topics had Halloween involved in them.  The topics included whether Halloween celebrations were becoming like Christmas, what people think of witches, where a person would go if they had a broomstick, trick-or-treating, whether we should have bonfires, memories of Halloween in youth, should fireworks be banned, favourite costumes for Halloween, what food is associated with Halloween, what does a person think of Halloween.  Following the topics, we had the evaluations part of the evening.

Myra evaluated Shauna, talking about how competent and confident she was, how the topics in her speech was very appropriate and something the audience was able to relate to.  Her only suggestion was to speak louder and project her voice.  Jim evaluated David, liking the structure, and getting to the point quickly.  The topic had made him think about the issue in a way he had never done so before.  Ger evaluated Dennis, liked the hand gestures, pace, how it was a great story telling.  His suggestion was to stop using “em” as much.

General evaluation was John H, full of compliments for both Barry and Pat at the beginning of the meeting, and really enjoyed the interaction during the debate and the topics session.  Really liked the speeches, and the evaluations, how they pointed out the good and the bad points of the speech.  He then handed control of the meeting back to Barry and Pat and the meeting closed soon after that.

Best Contributor                                                    David

Best Evaluator                                                      Ger

Best Topic Response                                             Mike (a guest)

Hellfire Meeting Review 22-9-13

Should we become vegetarians? Hellfire Toastmasters said yes.

Our meeting began as usual with Pat, our President, welcoming everyone, especially the guests, and informing everybody of the upcoming Christmas Party to be held early in December.  He then handed control of the meeting over to Dennis as Toastmaster for the evening.  He quickly ran through the program and after an explanation of the timing by Timer for the evening Mike and Barry, standing in as Sargent at Arms, telling us the exits and to turn of our phones, the first speech of the evening was given.

The first speaker was Mandy, an experienced Toastmaster who has held numerous roles within the club such as President and within the wider Toastmaster structure, such as Area Governor.  Mandy gave a PowerPoint Presentation to explain the Leadership Manual which is all too often forgotten by members, explaining each Stage of it and what a person would have to do to progress to the next stage.  She did this by using an example of one of the Stages and finished with the benefits for both the club and the person the manual provides.  The second speaker was Robert, a new member, who gave his Ice-Breaker speech.  He spoke about his up-bringing in Kerry and how sport played a huge part in his life, and many humorous stories of his time being educated in Glenstal Abbey.

The third and fourth speeches were both Stage 3 speeches, asking the speakers to “Get to the Point” in their speeches.  Kayleigh gave a speech on employment law in Ireland, something she has an expertise in given she works in the area.  She explained how new policies and legislation shortened the appeals process and that numerous courts were being merged into a two-tiered system.  Lisa delivered the final speech, and spoke about how a number of people have begun to use surfing and cooking as a way of integrating people in the Gaza Strip and bringing the Israeli and Palestinian people together.  She even included a quick Hummus recipe for us all!

Following the speeches was the debate on the motion “That we should become vegetarians,” with John O proposing and Jim opposing.  John spoke about how the world would need to produce 70% more food to feed the world’s population by 2025 and growing food for vegetarians requires less inputs.  Jim, in opposition, spoke about the need for meat for a healthy diet, especially for children growing up.  After numerous contributions from the floor and summary speeches by the debaters, a vote was taken and the motion was narrowly carried, by 11 votes to 10.  We then had our break for tea.

We resumed with our Topics session and Noel took control of the meeting, asking people about who the best person is to replace Giovanni Trappatoni, exercise making people happy, nicknames for cars, love conquering all things, among others.  They were all very well interesting and a nice mix of different subjects.

It was then time for the Evaluations.  Michael evaluated the first speaker Mandy, and was very complimentary of her speech, mentioning how prepared she was and the speech was well delivered.  He particularly liked how she gave a hand out to everybody about the Leadership Manual.  The second evaluator was Sinead who spoke about Robert’s Ice-Breaker.  She liked how he grabbed the audience’s attention at the start, had a good structure, was confident and had quite a lot of humour in the speech.  She suggested he used some hand gestures, though recognised that this would come in time.

The third evaluator was John H who evaluated Kayleigh’s speech.  He thought it was a very relevant topic for the speech that had lots of material that needed to be organised and she used good linking words and phrases.  He suggested that she might perhaps have been better to use a PowerPoint Presentation for this speech.  The final evaluation was for Lisa by Rose.  She liked how Lisa was very confident and spoke about a very interesting topic for her speech.  She suggested having a better structure, and to speak a little slower but louder.

It was finally left to Martin as General Evaluator to speak about his thoughts for the meeting as a whole and it was largely positive.  He learned a lot from the speeches and thought the debate was very interesting.  He had a couple of suggestions for the evaluators themselves, but thought they did a wonderful job though.  The meeting was then handed back to Dennis and Pat and after a few thank yous, the meeting finished and everyone left for home.

Best Contributor                                  Mandy

Best Evaluator                                    John H

Best Topic Response                            Colette

Hellfire Toastmasters 15/9/2013

Should performance enhancing drugs be allowed in professional sports? Hellfire Toastmasters said no

Back after a weird and wonderful trip to the Engineers Club for the Area Contest of the Humourous Speech and Table Topics Competition (what do you mean you didn’t get it?), Hellfire Toastmasters returned to our usual haunt of the Ballsbridge Hotel, with our members competition for spaces with the football fans travelling to the Aviva for Ireland’s match.  This resulted in the meeting starting a little later than usual but it didn’t deter us for too long.  Our President Pat opened the meeting with aplomb and after a few words from our Timer Kayleigh, and Sergeant-At-Arms David, handed the reigns over to Sinéad who was standing in as Toastmaster.  Sinéad gave a quick overview of the meeting and welcomed the nine guests, yes nine, for the evening.  She then introduced the first speaker for the evening.

Marlene was giving a Stage 9 speech, the objective of which is to Persuade with Power.  With this particular speech a speaker can either attempt to persuade people to take a certain action or adopt a certain viewpoint.  Marlene’s speech attempted the former, and succeed she did.  Asking us to manage our energy, not our time, Marlene spoke about people’s physical, emotional, mental and spiritual energy and our need to concentrate on these things, as opposed to simply our time.

The second speaker was Richard, also giving a Stage 9 speech, and unlike Marlene, attempted to change the audience’s viewpoint on emigration and immigration.  Richard wanted the audience to show more compassion for immigrants into Ireland, especially given this country’s problem with emigration.

The final speech was given by Paul, a new member, and it was his Ice-Breaker.  The object of the Ice-Breaker is to speak before an audience for the first time and discover speaking skills not already known.  Paul’s Ice-Breaker was wonderful, showing speaking skills well in advance of what is expected for an Ice-Breaker.  He gave a short overview of his life, primarily his interest in sport and the journeys he has taken around the world.

Following the final speech, we had our debate, a feature unique to Hellfire among Toastmasters clubs in the area.  The motion was ”that performance enhancing drugs should be allowed in professional sport”, proposed by Barry and opposed by Richard.  Barry argued that if these drugs are allowed they could be made even better by chemists and athletes bigger and stronger.  He also spoke about the thrill of sport and how this would make sport better.  Richard, in opposition, argued about the potentially fatal side-effects of these drugs and how it maintains the idea of winning at all costs.  After contributions from the floor and summations by both debaters, a vote was taken and Richard declared the winner.

Following a short tea break and chat, the meeting resumed with a Topics session, ably convened by Jim.  Topics included favourite seasons, favourite days of the week, favourite Irish tradition, whether money is a good or a bad thing, what country a person would visit among many others.

Next up was the speech evaluations, which are great because it gives the speaker a chance to work on certain things and it means the evaluator has to listen carefully to the speech with a critical ear.  Niamh was first up, evaluating Marlene, mentioned the excellent and complementary topic chosen for the speech and the delivery was very good.  Aileen evaluated Richard and thought the speech was very well delivered.  Finally Noel evaluated Paul and spoke about how Paul was a very competent speaker already with good structure and a good topic.  The only suggestions for all the speakers were to time the speech a bit better, slow down a little and repeat the main points of the speech during the speech.

Finally we had our general evaluator, Rose, who was full of praise for the speakers but thought some people could have spoken louder, as it was hard for some people to hear what was said.  But overall, she was happy with the night given the problems associated with the match in the Aviva.

Contributor                                                        Paul

Evaluator                                                           Niamh

Topics                                                                Kayleigh

Hellfire Toastmasters 19-3-2013


Should guns be legalised for personal protection in Ireland? That’s debatable.

Another Tuesday, another Toastmasters meeting, another interesting evening.  Brian, our reserve President, began the meeting at 8pm, welcoming everyone and the guests that attended.  He introduced our Toastmasters for the night, Ger, who got the meeting running and the speeches started, with a brief mention of the timing and the escape routes in case of an emergency by the multi-tasking Dennis.

The first speech was a Stage 2 speech by John H, a returning Toastmaster who is on the road to becoming a Competent Communicator once again.  Beginning with a personal anecdote about watching the new pope on the television, John spoke about the leadership qualities needed for success.  He gave an interesting account of the life of Marcus Aurelius, a 2nd Century Roman Emperor, who wrote an influential guide to leadership which John believes all leaders should read.  The second speech was an Ice-Breaker by Mark.  Standing away from the podium without any notes, Mark showed skill even the most experienced Toastmaster would be unable to match.  He spoke about two important dates, his birth and his upcoming wedding day and how he has three older sisters, or as he refers to them, four mothers.  This is a promising start to a Toastmasters career, and a few people asked him to give his wedding speech in the upcoming weeks, as it will be a useful exercise for Mark.

The third speech was given by Richard, a Stage 8 speech which involves using visual aids.  With the wonderful assistance of Niamh changing the slides, he gave a brief history of human capacity, of people being able to smile, laugh, inspire, but also to do horrific things, like World War II and 9/11.  However, he told us one voice can change things, like Rosa Parks sitting where she wanted to sit on a bus, and 60 years later, there is a black President.  The final speech was a Stage 9 speech by Elizabeth, which asks her to Persuade with Power.  Doing a wonderful job, Elizabeth told us about FairTrade products and motivated us to but these products, as opposed to Non-FareTrade items which could be produced by people living in abject conditions.  She also brought along KitKat chocolate bars, which everybody really enjoyed at the break.

Following the speeches, it was time for the debate.  On the motion “Guns in Ireland should be legalised for personal protection”, proposer John G talked about the problems with criminals having guns whereas citizens couldn’t defend themselves.  This means that criminals can do terrible things, because citizens and the Gardaí can’t fight back.  Lisa opposed the motion, talking about how guns in the hands of irrational people can be very harmful, citing recent shootings in the US.  The debate was thrown open to the floor with some interesting arguments, such as guns coming into the hands of children and how greater guns in houses can be a deterrent for criminals.  After summation speeches by both debaters, a vote was taken and the motion carried.  After all that excitement, it was time for a break.

We returned from the break to the topics part of the meeting, with Cian in the hot seat as Topicsmaster.  He ensured that everyone who hadn’t spoken at the meeting so far was given a topic, with questions such as describing a bank robbery, a favourite teacher in school and the Cypriot bailout.

The next part of the meeting was the evaluations.  All of the evaluators were very happy with the speeches, with Niamh evaluating John, Susan evaluating Mark, Noel evaluating Richard and Jim evaluating Elizabeth.  There were very few suggestions, which is a credit to all of the speakers.  Finally Barry gave a general evaluation which was very praiseworthy of all speakers on the night, with only a couple of suggestions for Ger, the Toastmaster.

The prizes went to:

  • Contribution - Richard
  • Evaluation – Noel
  • Topic – Mandy

That’s all from this week folks, I’m Richard and I’ve been your host.  Next week we’re in the Engineers club for the Area final.  Best of luck to all of our competitors!

Evaluation and International Speech Contest – 12th March 2013

Evaluation and Speech Contest and Hellfire Toastmasters

Time for a challenge!

No debate this week, as the competition heated up for the Hellfire Toastmasters round of the International Speech and Evaluations Contest. This contest goes all the way to the top, with the potential, after many many rounds, to compete in the grand final at the annual Toastmasters conference.

First up were the four entrants into the international speech contest. Numbers drawn, contestants briefed by the able contest chair, Myra, and podium at the ready, the competition began. The entrants, John O’, Martin, Sinead and Richard were all polished and prepared. Martin’s speech on the image vs the reality of retirement carried the day, with John O’s speech on Cheltenham coming a close second. Pipped at the post in third place was Richard’s excellent speech on the steely resolve and motivation of Jim Steynes.

A topics session led by Rose, notable for the lively discussion of private school fees (methinks I see a debate topic for next month on the horizon) followed. Then it was time for tea.

After Myra reconvened the meeting, it was time for the second contest of the night, the evaluation competition. Cian was the brave speaker who offered to allow the six competition entrants rip his speech apart  offer him helpful recommendations. His speech on his trip to China fulfilled its goal of being extremely entertaining, with anecdotes about train stations, flowing blonde locks and the horrors of spitting.

The six contestants – Richard, Niamh, Sinead, Zanya, Elizabeth and John O’ – evaluated the speech in turn, offering recommendations on the speeches structure, body language and vocal variety while offering a large amount of praise for the use of humor throughout the speech, the relaxed stance away from the podium Cian adopted, the lack of notes, the use of repetition, the flow of the speech and many other small details that escape my mind.

The meeting concluded with the announcement of the winners. For the Speech competition:

  • 1st Place – Martin
  • 2nd Place – John O’
  • 3rd Place – Richard

For the Evaluation Competition:

  • 1st Place – Niamh
  • 2nd Place – Zanya
  • 3rd Place – Sinead

First and second place in each category will go through to round two, the area competition, which takes place at the Engineers Toastmasters club on the 26th March.

A final word of thanks to Noel and new member Mark who performed the duties of timers for the meeting. Also to Barry for his role as Contest Seargeant at Arms, Cecil for his always excellent management of the judging process, the judges who shall remain anonymous and the numerous guests in the audience who we always love to see!


Meeting Report – 22nd January, 2013

Debate: As A Society We Need to Learn To Demonstrate

Should we protest more?

Paulo was the man of the two and a half hours tonight, and an able man he was. He opened the meeting promptly at 8.03pm and President Susan began the meeting by giving us all some gentle encouragement to

Enter the Tall Tales Competition

She’s right, you should.

There quickly followed the admin of any meeting. Barry, featuring as the worlds most unlikely air hostess, pointed us to the fire exits and warned us to switch off our phones. Since no phones went off throughout the meeting, there is evidence that people were practising the essential Toastmaster skill of listening. Following a brief introduction to the art of Timekeeping from Aengus, the meeting proper got under way.

First up was Mike, who in a rather rousing speech, encouraged us all to bring our speechcraft skills to the masses, and develop skills in others through mentoring programs. Which reminds me, existing members – we need volunteers for mentors. Next up was Rose, who stepped up at the last minute, and put together an interesting and engaging speech about Percy French. Third up was Richard who in a very relevant speech talked about the power of words. All three of these speeches were off stage speeches, always difficult to evaluate. However evaluated they were, and ably so by Elizabeth, Susan and Martin. Each evaluator brought out the positives in the speeches, Elizabeth in particular mentioned several nice examples of specific phrases and alliterations used by Mike. Not to be too nice, all three evaluators also gave good advice on where speakers could improve.

Finally Cian gave his stage five speech, the purpose of which was to bring in body language to make his point. This he did and he did well, with a speech on the psychology of self-defence. His opening was particularly strong, when he woke the audience up by demonstrating how one should yell at an attacker to back off. Nearly sent me scurrying from the room. His speech was evaluated wonderfully by John H, who has recently rejoined the club after a few years absence.  John brought the guidelines of the manual in wonderfully, praised Cian’s speech (praise which was well deserved), and demonstrating the problem himself, gave Cian some feedback on the need to finish speeches in a timely fashion.

After the speeches came the debate. A nice topic this week, not too controversial, not negatively phrased, lots of juicy detail for the debators and the audience to get their teeth into. Mandy was first up for the proposition, and argued her point persuasively in a well structured speech, that really laid out the motion well. Jim opted for the more passionate orator style in his opposition speech, and as usual succeeded well. Then the motion was opened to the floor. There was no wishy washy stuff, everybody spoke firmly either for or against the motion, which is always nice. Martin produced one of my favourite moments of the evening when he pointed out the hazards of demonstrating, people who really don’t deserve entitlements get to keep them simply by being loud, in spite of it being undemocratic, unfair, and bleeding the country dry. After eight contributions from the floor, Jim and then Mandy summed up. Mandy won the motion comfortably, and lo it was time for tea and biccies.

After the tea and biccies came everyone’s favourite part of the evening – Topics.

John G proved himself a master of topics. The topics were varied, they avoided the usual stereotypes, they challenged people, but they didn’t challenge them too much. Particular Kudos goes to the two visitors who spoke – Victor and Julie. Julie in particular got a particularly tricky question that included a Shakespeare quote on the frailty of women, but her response was excellent, and it meant I didn’t get it, which in some ways is the most important thing. I have to say my favourite response to a topic came from Aengus who chose three people to bring to a desert island – Cheryl Cole, Usain Bolt and Barack Obama.

I may see a flaw in that plan there Aengus.

Following the topics, were the evaluations of the speeches, which I’ve already covered. Then Marlene stepped up as em counter. A horrible job, but she did it well. It seems perhaps we made some progress over last week, but there’s still a long long road ahead. Finally there was the general evaluation from Niamh, which summed up the meeting almost as well as this post, and the awarding of the trophies, as follows:

  • Speech – Cian
  • Evaluator – John H
  • Topic – Julie and Victor

and so the meeting ended and we all went home.


Meeting Report – 15th January

Thomas Gray

Thomas Gray

Oh what a meeting.

Elizabeth, while in theory an inexperienced Toastmaster, managed to remember absolutely every single detail that very experienced Toastmasters regularly forget. There was a seargeant at arms, which even though there thankfully was no fire was still comforting. There was an introduction from the timekeeper. There was even a surprise appearance by an Um and Ah counter, but more on that later.

There were three speeches. First up was Niamh, giving her stage 8 speech. Stage 8 requires the use of visual aids, so with a fabulous presentation done using “Prezi”, Niamh started the meeting with a presentation full of maps made by strangers. The full presentation can be seen here.

Next up, from the modern era to a big step back in time, the story of the 1914 Christmas ceasefire from Pat. Beautifully told, beautifully read, and very timely with the 100th anniversary of the start of the first world war coming next year.

The final speech of the evening was from Dennis, who pulled a master stroke with his innovative idea. He first took a few minutes to introduce one of his favourite poems,

“Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” by Thomas Gray

and then proceeded (rather worryingly) to give each member of the audience numbered envelopes. Inside each envelope was a marked verse of the poem. Beginning and finishing with Dennis, each member of the audience read their own verse. The effect was striking as the different intonations, voices and accents each put a spin on their own verse. Like an expert conductor, Dennis’s oversight ensured the reading flowed perfectly and the change of pace drew universal praise.

Next up was the debate, and as promised it was lively and controversial.

Gender quotas should be introduced in the Dáil

Proposed by Keith and opposed by Martin, the issues raised included the hazards of single sex workplaces, the lack of female participation at a grassroots level in political parties, the calibre of our current political representatives and the unfriendliness of political life to family life. At the end of the day it seemed the audience and the debators agreed on one thing – that change was needed, but fundamentally disagreed on how that change should be brought about. Keith carried the day with unanimous support, slightly worrying since that included Martin, but I guess he was just that convincing.

And so it was time for tea and biscuits, and a lovely tea and lovelier biscuits it was too.

After the break Paulo stepped up to the top table to issue topics, and since the meeting was running ahead of schedule he had plenty of time to  torture  hand out his topics. My personal favourites were the question to Rose on online dating, Aengus on Jon Walters efforts to join Chelsea, Michelle (a welcome guest from engineers) on new years resolutions and Aileen on volunteering.

And so to the final part of the evening, or so we thought, evaluations. They were good, but the Toastmaster had a surprise in store. Unbeknownst to the audience, Zanya had been taking an extremely thorough list of ums, ahs and “you knows”. It was a little embarrassing and a little disconcerting to say the least. It was also extremely helpful because as she pointed out, most people begin their speeches with a machine gun spatter of ems and ahs but as they gain confidence and relax into it, the fillers disappear. At least we now know where to focus our efforts.

The meeting concluded with the always on point, Barry, giving a comprehensive general evaluation and awarding the trophies.

  • Topics – Aileen
  • Speech – Dennis
  • Evaluator – Ger

and so the gavel was banged, the meeting was over and we tidied up.

The End. . .

(until next week)



Toastmasters Meeting – 4th December

Our penultimate meeting of 2012, only the Christmas drinks to go!

And what a great meeting it was.

A wonderful sales presentation from Zanya, which included what was probably the quote of the night from Keith

Oh Nike make GAA shoes now do they?

Followed by a self-assured and confident stage two speech from Aengus on the perils of watching too much sport, a well researched and enlightening speech from John McD on beer and finally a speech from Bernard on the search for Alien life.

The debate, was as always, a highlight of the evening. Marlene proposed that “No animals or plants should be considered pests”, and Dennis had the tricky job of opposing. It was lively, with six contributions from the floor, but eventually the motion was defeated and we all adjourned for a tea break.

After tea, Martin our toastmaster introduced an innovation – the tall tale. Frank, a guest for the evening, left us hanging on the edge of a cliff shouting at God. After that Aileen peppered the audience with a range of topics, from the intensive media attention to the status of the Duchess of Cambridge’s uterus to social welfare reform.

Finally it was time for the concluding part of the evening, evaluations. Suffice is to say the usual range of praise and helpful advice was given and Mandy rounded off the evening with the awards which went to

  • Elizabeth – best evaluation
  • Zanya – best contribution
  • Sinead – best topic

and so ended another very funny, and very interesting toastmasters meeting.

Why Hellfire?

Hellfire Toastmasters Trophies

Why Hellfire?

Toastmasters is organised on a club basis, i.e. every member joins a club which is a part of the larger organisation. Every club has a slightly different flavour, all are good but depending on your personality and what you want from Toastmasters, some may be a better fit then others.

There are many reasons you should choose Hellfire as your Toastmasters club, some of these are:

  • We’re a great way to develop your public speaking and debating skills.
  • We have the best name.
  • We’re extremely friendly, ridiculously so, come to a meeting and you’ll see.
  • We’ve been around 50 years, and we have a lot of experience in our club.
  • We meet every week, which gives you more opportunities to speak.
  • We’re ten minutes walk from Merrion Square
  • Our membership is incredibly varied, which means you get perspectives across age ranges and professions.

On that last point, one of the big worries for people attending for the first time, is will I fit in? Our members range in age from early 20’s to late 70’s, possibly even a little further, but I’d be shot for saying that. There are a handful of students, people working in their first jobs, people who are unemployed, people right in the middle of their careers and people who are retired. People have jobs in healthcare, some in retail, a few in banks . . .Suffice is to say, please don’t worry about fitting in.

but let’s be honest, the main reason that people choose a Toastmasters club is because the time and place of the meeting suits them. So if 8pm in Ballsbridge on a Tuesday suits you, please come along!

If that doesn’t suit, all Toastmaster clubs are great, and Dublin has a wide range to choose from.

Attend your first meeting →